An article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association entitled, “Assessment of Studies Evaluating Spinal Manipulative Therapy and Infectious Disease and Immune System Outcomes”, the authors concluded that clinical evidence was found to support or refute claims that SMT was efficacious or effective in changing immune system outcomes. They said that there is limited preliminary basic scientific studies suggesting that SMT increases immune and hormonal markers, the clinical relevance is unknown, and more studies are necessary. ~ Dr. Broussard
Assessment of Studies Evaluating Spinal Manipulative Therapy and Infectious Disease and Immune System Outcomes
April 13, 2021
A Systematic Review
Ngai Chow, DC, MSc
JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(4):e215493. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5493
Key Points
Question Is spinal manipulative therapy associated with changes in the immune system?
Findings In this systematic review of 13 studies comprising 795 participants, no clinical studies investigated the efficacy or effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy in preventing or improving disease-specific outcomes among patients with infectious disease. Preliminary laboratory experiments indicated that spinal manipulative therapy may, in the short term, be associated with levels of change in immunological biomarkers among asymptomatic participants.
Meaning These findings suggest that, given the limitations of the evidence, claims that spinal manipulative therapy is associated with changes in the immune system are premature and further clinical studies should be completed.
Importance Claims that spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) can improve immune function have increased substantially during the COVID-19 pandemic and may have contributed to the rapid spread of both accurate and inaccurate information (referred to as an infodemic by the World Health Organization).
Objective To identify, appraise, and synthesize the scientific literature on the efficacy and effectiveness of SMT in preventing the development of infectious disease or improving disease-specific outcomes in patients with infectious disease and to examine the association between SMT and selected immunological, endocrine, and other physiological biomarkers.
Evidence Review A literature search of MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Index to Chiropractic Literature, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase was conducted from inception to April 15, 2020. Randomized clinical trials and cohort studies were included. Eligible studies were critically appraised, and evidence with high and acceptable quality was synthesized using the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis guideline.
Findings A total of 2593 records were retrieved; after exclusions, 50 full-text articles were screened, and 16 articles reporting the findings of 13 studies comprising 795 participants were critically appraised. The literature search found no clinical studies that investigated the efficacy or effectiveness of SMT in preventing the development of infectious disease or improving disease-specific outcomes among patients with infectious disease. Eight articles reporting the results of 6 high- and acceptable-quality RCTs comprising 529 participants investigated the effect of SMT on biomarkers. Spinal manipulative therapy was not associated with changes in lymphocyte levels or physiological markers among patients with low back pain or participants who were asymptomatic compared with sham manipulation, a lecture series, and venipuncture control groups. Spinal manipulative therapy was associated with short-term changes in selected immunological biomarkers among asymptomatic participants compared with sham manipulation, a lecture series, and venipuncture control groups.
Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review of 13 studies, no clinical evidence was found to support or refute claims that SMT was efficacious or effective in changing immune system outcomes. Although there were limited preliminary data from basic scientific studies suggesting that SMT may be associated with short-term changes in immunological and endocrine biomarkers, the clinical relevance of these findings is unknown. Given the lack of evidence that SMT is associated with the prevention of infectious diseases or improvements in immune function, further studies should be completed before claims of efficacy or effectiveness are made.